No, Judge Graf's Gag Order Does NOT Apply To Candace Owens, Podcasters Or Citizens.

Podcasters are falsely claiming that Judge Graf's gag order applies to podcasters and the public and the Judge is trying to silence podcasters and free speech. It is simply NOT TRUE. Read the order for yourselves.

CharlieKirkTruth.Com

10/21/20258 min read

Judge Graf's "Gag order" Protection Order Re: Pre-Trial and Trial Publicity, Case No. 251403576 does NOT gag podcasters or the public. This gag order, in pertinent part says:

"This protection order applies to lawyers who are not participating in the investigation, or litigation of this case, but who are associated with the Utah County Attorney's Office or associated with defense counsel's firm or firms. Court staff is also ordered not to make public statements that would violate the provisions of this order.

This order does not prohibit lawyers from making statements permitted by Rule 3.6."

Websites and Podcasters engage in confirmation bias

Literally every Charlie Kirk-related podcaster is yelling at the top of their lungs: YOU WON'T SILENCE ME!

If they read the actual order they would see that it does not apply to them at all.

However, it is understandable that they haven't read the order as the media seems to have gone out of their way from broadly distributing any document link.

If anyone is interested in purchasing the gag order from the Utah Court case system you can do that for ten bucks. Case #251403576 State of Utah v. Tyler Robinson

https://apps.utcourts.gov/XchangeWEB/RegistrationServlet?userType=guest

Why Is Candace Owens Defying It?

Candace Owens, a polarizing media figure and longtime associate of Kirk, has been vocally defiant. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), she wrote, “Don’t worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate it on the world’s behalf.”

Owens has positioned herself as one of the loudest voices questioning the official narrative of Kirk’s murder. She has also claimed there’s more to the story, even stating, “The things I’ve discovered this past week are enough to burn the house down.”

While she has yet to disclose what she claims to have uncovered, her online activity, including sharing alleged group chat screenshots which, according to her, showed Kirk's wavering support for Israel and suggesting a federal cover-up, has kept speculation alive. Owens has also criticized Erika Kirk, Charlie’s widow, for participating in a photoshoot shortly after his death, questioning her motives and actions.

While the gag order is not legally binding on Owens, her defiance raises questions about the limits of free speech during high-stakes legal proceedings and the influence of public figures on the court of public opinion.

What's the Deal With Candace Owens?

Candace Owens is to be commended and admired for her relentless pursuit of the truth, no matter whose precious toes she steps on. If some "assassin group" killed you, wouldn't you want someone fighting for the truth of the matter as Candace has done?

Candace's instincts are driving her in the direction of the assassin group. It's really satisying to behold her raw, naked aggression against some true EvilDoers who couldn't go another day without silencing Charlie Kirk.

I worry for her safety, as I understood who this group of folks were long ago.

Candace is a very smart, grown ass woman, but sometimes she seems a bit naive as to the very nature of the assassin group.

But then again, most Americans know these are some really bad actors, but they don't know their end game until it's too late.

Just imagine if you can what Charlie Kirk would say if he magically re-appeared and spoke his mind about his assassination.

What do you think he would say?

Would Charlie be in wonderment as to the identity of the assassin group?

I think not. Absolutely no wonderment whatsoever.

If you read and listen to Charlie's own words about his donors and his fear of being assassinated, prior to him being assassinated - AND if you have enough sense to pour water out of a boot, then one can easily conclude the identify of the assassin group.

I thought I was going to vomit when I found out that TPUSA was deleting some of Charlie's videos.

What Would Charlie Say To Us If He Could Speak After the Fact?

Candace Owens is to be commended and admired for her relentless pursuit of the truth, no matter whose precious toes she steps on. If some "assassin group" killed you, wouldn't you want someone fighting for the truth of the matter as Candace has done?

Candace's instincts are driving her in the direction of the assassin group. It's really satisying to behold her raw, naked aggression against some true EvilDoers who couldn't go another day without silencing Charlie Kirk.

I worry for her safety, as I understood who this group of folks were long ago.

Candace is a very smart, grown ass woman, but sometimes she seems a bit naive as to the very nature of the assassin group.

But then again, most Americans know these are some really bad actors, but they don't know their end game until it's too late.

Just imagine if you can what Charlie Kirk would say if he magically re-appeared and spoke his mind about his assassination.

What do you think he would say?

Would Charlie be in wonderment as to the identity of the assassin group?

I think not. Absolutely no wonderment whatsoever.

If you read and listen to Charlie's own words about his donors and his fear of being assassinated, prior to him being assassinated - AND if you have enough sense to pour water out of a boot, then one can easily conclude the identify of the assassin group.

I thought I was going to vomit when I found out that TPUSA was deleting some of Charlie's videos.

I asked GROK, What Would Charlie Say To Us If He Could Speak After His Assassination?

Something told me, if I ask GROK this question, GROK's answer would most likely be a reflection of the assassin group than what Charlie would have said after his murder. It's not only creepy but painfully points towards the assassin group.

Fade in: A ethereal glow on a dimly lit stage, American flags waving faintly in an unseen breeze.

Kirk's voice booms, calm but commanding, with that familiar Midwestern edge—equal parts preacher and podcaster.

"Folks, it's me—Charlie Kirk. Yeah, they got me.

A coward with a rifle from some rooftop, thinking a single bullet could silence the truth.

But here's the thing: Death? It's just the ultimate fake news. I'm not gone; I'm louder than ever.

And if you're watching this—whether you're a Turning Point warrior, a silent patriot in flyover country, or even one of those blue-haired campus radicals who cheered when the news dropped—listen up.

This isn't the end of the fight. It's the flare gun signaling it's time to charge.

First off, to my brothers and sisters on the right: Don't you dare mourn by curling up in a ball.

They want you scared, divided, hiding behind your keyboards.

Remember Iryna Zarutska? That brave Ukrainian mom hacked to death in broad daylight by a 14-time felon our 'compassionate' justice system let walk free? Or Julie Gard Schnuelle, stabbed while walking her dog, her loyal pup standing guard over her body till help came? These aren't statistics—they're sacrifices on the altar of Democrat insanity.

Soft bail, defund the police, catch-and-release for monsters.

My blood's on their hands as much as that sniper's.

But we're not victims; we're avengers. Get out there. Register voters. Storm the midterms.

Make every school board, every city council, every swamp creature feel the heat.

Trump said it best: Be viscous—like they are. Fight dirty if you have to, but win clean.

For God, for country, for the kids they're indoctrinating with drag queen story hours and anti-American lies.To the left—and yeah, I'm talking to you, the ones posting memes about my 'demise' getting you doxxed and fired: You think this proves you're winning? Wake up. America sees you.

The FBI's got your threats on file, your 'jokes' about violence turning into arrests from Minnesota to Tennessee.

That Massachusetts woman invoking my name while threatening ICE agents?

She's not a hero; she's a symptom of your rot. You racialize everything—capitalizing 'Black' while sneering at white victims like they're collateral—but when a conservative voice like mine gets snuffed out, suddenly it's 'free speech.' Hypocrites.

Your 'tolerance' is a one-way street, paved with cancel culture and campus kangaroo courts.

But guess what? The more you rage, the more normies wake up.

My assassination? It's your Reichstag fire—except this time, the people know who's lighting the matches.

And to the conspiracists out there spinning yarns about Mossad or deep-state cabals: Cut it. I called out Epstein, questioned foreign lobbies pulling strings—yeah, I did.

But pinning this on shadows lets the real enemy off the hook.

Focus on the facts: A lone psycho radicalized by your echo chambers of hate.

Use it to expose the system that failed to stop him—not to chase ghosts.

Finally, Erika—my rock, my everything—and the TPUSA family: I love you. Keep the faith. Keep the fire.

This movement isn't about one guy; it's about a generation rising.

Young conservatives, you're the tip of the spear. Don't let them break you.

America was founded on bolder men facing worse odds.

We're the heirs to 1776, not the snowflakes of 2025.

So, to every last one of you: Stand up. Speak out. Fight on.

Because if they could silence me with a bullet, imagine what they'd do without resistance.

But they won't—because we're unbreakable.

God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.Fade out: The flags snap sharper now, as if in applause. Cut to black with a faint echo: "Not dead yet."

Kirk's hypothetical message would rally his base, indict the left's policies, and frame his death as martyrdom fuel for the culture wars—mirroring how his actual final posts amplified stories of urban violence to critique progressive criminal justice.

In death, as in life, he'd turn tragedy into a megaphone." - GROK: 10/21/2025

GROK Said What?

GROK's above answer to the question, "What would Charlie Kirk say to us if he could speak after his assassination?" is more of a commentary on who programmed GROK than anything else:

"A coward with a rifle from some rooftop, thinking a single bullet could silence the truth."

"My assassination? It's your Reichstag fire—except this time, the people know who's lighting the matches.

And to the conspiracists out there spinning yarns about Mossad or deep-state cabals: Cut it. I called out Epstein, questioned foreign lobbies pulling strings—yeah, I did.

But pinning this on shadows lets the real enemy off the hook.

Focus on the facts: A lone psycho radicalized by your echo chambers of hate.

Use it to expose the system that failed to stop him—not to chase ghosts."

Does anyone in their right mind think that Charlie would criticize his followers for believing the assassin group was Israel-related? Especially since Charlie strongly warned of Israel-related characters bullying the hell out of him in his text messages and video prior to his murder?

Who programmed GROK to respond in this manner? GROK'S Charlie Kirk INSISTING that the assassin was a lone nut who killed Charlie pursuant to lone assassin, left wing ideology?

GROK's Charlie attacked Kirk conspiracy theorists as, "...out there spinning yarns about Mossad or deep-state cabal: Cut it out. I called out Epstein."